|
|
Iowa Ethics & Campaign Disclosure
Board
Today is:-
|
|
| About the
Board
Address Lists
Blank Report
Forms
Campaigns
Ethics
Filing Electronically
Lobbying
Laws/Rules/Opinions
Sanctions/Actions
View Reports
|
AGENCY
PLAN FOR REGULATORY REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
-
-
- The
mission of the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board
(Board) is to promote the public's trust and confidence
in government by ensuring the integrity of political
campaigns, the ethical standards for employees of the
executive branch of state government and the lawful
conduct of executive branch lobbyists. The Board understands
that while it must fully enforce the statutes and rules
under its jurisdiction, this enforcement should not
discourage individuals from being involved in the political
process or from seeking and maintaining employment with
state government. In order to accomplish its Mission,
the Board enforces the provisions of the "Campaign
Disclosure-Income Tax Checkoff Act" in Iowa Code
Chapter 68A, the "Iowa Public Officials Act"
in Iowa Code Chapter 68B and the Board's administrative
rules in Chapter 351 of the Iowa Administrative Code.
Pursuant to the mandate of Executive Order 8, the Board
will conduct a comprehensive review of its administrative
rules to eliminate outdated, redundant, ineffective
and unnecessary rules. The purpose of the review is
to better serve the citizens of Iowa who come into contact
with the Board and fall under the purview of its administrative
rules.
I. Methodology used to determine if rules comply
with Executive Order 8 standards:
-
- A.
The Board's Legal Counsel and the Board's Policy/Rules
Subcommittee Chair,
- Professor
James A. Albert, Professor of Law at Drake University
(Subcommittee Chair), will review each individual
chapter of the Board's rules in Chapter 351.
-
- B.
Each chapter will first be reviewed by the Board's
Legal Counsel and the Subcommittee Chair. A report
of this review will then be submitted to the Policy/Rules
Subcommittee and the Board's Executive Director.
This report will take into account the following
information:
-
- 1.
Feedback from constituent groups and the public
received by the Board.
-
- 2.
Written complaints concerning rules during the
past five years.
-
- 3.
A review of Board policies that should be included
in rule form.
-
- 4.
The criteria set out in Executive Order 8 as
follows:
-
- a.
Need:
-
- (1)
Is the rule necessary to comply with
the statutes authorizing it?
(2) Is the rule obsolete, duplicative,
or ambiguous to a degree that warrants
repeal or revision?
-
- (3)
Have laws or other circumstances changed
to the extent that the rule should be
amended or repealed?
-
- (4)
Is the rule effective and necessary
to carry out the Board's mission?
-
- (5)
Is the rule broader than necessary to
accomplish its purpose or objective?
-
- b.
Clarity:
-
- (1)
Is the rule written and organized in
a clear and concise manner so that it
can be readily understood by those to
whom it applies?
(2) Are there Board policies, written
or unwritten, that need to be put into
rule form that would help clarify the
rule?
-
- c.
Intent and Statutory Authorization:
-
- (1)
Is the rule consistent with the legislative
intent of the statutes that authorize
it?
-
- (2)
Is the rule based upon sufficient statutory
authority?
-
- (3)
Is there a need to develop additional
legislative authorization in order to
accomplish the Board's mission?
(4) Are there Board policies, written
or unwritten, that should be put into
rule form to better serve the public?
-
- d.
Cost:
-
- (1)
Have the qualitative and quantitative
benefits of the rule been considered
in relation to its costs?
-
- (2)
Do all of the qualitative and quantitative
benefits exceed the costs of the rule?
-
- (3)
Is there a less burdensome way to achieve
the intended result of the rule?
-
- e.
Fairness:
-
- (1)
Does the rule result in the equitable
treatment of those required to comply
with it?
-
- (2)
Is the rule in its application fair
and predictable?
-
- (3)
Should the rule be modified to eliminate
or minimize any disproportionate impacts
on the regulated community?
-
- (4)
Are there Board policies, written or
unwritten, that should be put into rule
form to help ensure fairness to everyone
coming into contact with the Board?
-
- C.
The Board's Policy/Rules Subcommittee and Executive
Director shall then review the report submitted
by Legal Counsel and the Subcommittee Chair. The
Subcommittee and Executive Director may make any
recommendations, modifications or direct further
review as the members see fit. The Subcommittee
shall then issue a report to the full Board.
-
- D.
The full Board shall then review both reports and
make any recommendations, modifications or direct
further review as the members see fit.
-
- E.
The Board shall then submit any and all findings
to the Office of the Governor as required by Executive
Order 8.
-
- F.
The Board shall provide a copy of its Agency Plan
and all reports to any person who files a request.
-
- G.
The Board shall then initiate the rule making process
to carry out the findings of the various reports.
H. During this review process, the Board's Executive
Director will obtain from staff all policies, written
or unwritten, that are currently being enforced.
A determination will then be made during the rules
review process on which policies should be put into
rule form.
-
- II.
Steps to encourage public participation in the review
process:
-
- A.
Copy of agency plan shall be published on Board
web site along with invitation for public input.
-
- B.
Information will be provided to anyone having requests
on file for notification of rule changes.
-
- C.
Copy of agency plan shall be sent to major constituency
groups as determined by Executive Director, Legal
Counsel and Subcommittee Chair.
-
- D.
Invitations for public input shall be given at all
meetings and conferences involving constituents
and public.
-
- E.
All written complaints during the past five years
will be noted and considered.
-
- III.
Board may require an exception to these requirements
in the following instance:
-
- A.
Rules mandated by state or federal law and over
which the Board does not have the power or legal
right to change or modify. The Board will note such
instances in its Final Report.
-
- IV.
Process for on-going review of rules after the initial
period has expired:
-
- A.
The Board will comply with the appropriate requirements
and provisions of Executive Order 8.
-
- B.
The Board will review all future rules under the
criteria set out in Executive Order 8 and the principles
stated in this document.
-
- C.
The Board will comply with the regulatory principles
in Executive Order 9.
-
- D.
The Board will make its personnel available to the
Committee set out in Executive Order 10.
-
- E.
Any problems cited by the Board or the public it
serves will be reviewed under the principles set
out in Executive Order 8 and Executive Order 9.
-
- F.
The Board will continue to monitor policies, written
or unwritten, that should be put into rule form.
Said rule making shall comply with the principles
set out in Executive Order 8 and Executive Order
9.
-
- G.
The Board will otherwise comply with all of the
principles, timelines and filings required by Executive
Order 8 and Executive Order 9.
-
- V.
Schedule for rule groupings review:
- Chapter
351
-
- A.
Chapter 1 "Complaint, Investigation
Resolution"
-
- B.
Chapter 2 "Election Campaign Fund"
-
- C.
Chapter 3 "County Commissioners
of Elections"
-
- D.
Chapter 4 "Campaign Disclosure
Procedures"
-
- E.
Chapter 5 "Ethics & Campaign Disclosure
Board"
-
- F.
Chapter 6 "Civil Penalties"
-
- G.
Chapter 7 "Contested Case Procedures"
-
- H.
Chapter 8 "Petitions for Rule Making"
-
- I.
Chapter 9 "Declaratory Order"
-
- J.
Chapter 10 "Public Records and Fair
Information Practices"
-
- K.
Chapter 11 "Personal Financial Disclosure"
-
- L.
Chapter 12 "Codes of Conduct"
-
- M.
Chapter 13 "Executive Branch Lobbyists"
-
|
- Legal
Counsel/
- Subcommittee
Chair
-
- 5-2001
-
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
-
- 5-2001
-
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
-
- 5-2001
|
-
- Subcommittee
-
- 7-2001
-
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
-
- 7-2001
-
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
-
- 7-2001
|
-
- Board
-
- 9-2001
-
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
-
- 9-2001
-
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
-
- 9-2001
|
N.
Chapter 14 (Adoption by reference of uniform rule
on Agency Procedure for Rule Making) with no review
needed.
O. Chapter 15 (Uniform Waiver Rules still in rule
making process) and no review needed. |
-
VI. Explanation of projected timeline:
-
- A.
The Board believes that sufficient time should be
afforded to this project. As such, the timeline
allows a great deal of time for a thorough review,
yet complies with the filing report deadline of
November 1, 2001.
B. The dates used above are when the reports will
be issued. In May of 2001, Legal Counsel and Subcommittee
Chair will issue the initial review report to the
Policy/Rules Subcommittee and Executive Director.
In July of 2001, the Subcommittee and Executive
Director will issue its report on the initial review
report. In September of 2001, the full Board will
issue its Final Report. This still allows two additional
months for further review before the November filing
deadline.
-
- C.
The timeline ensures that sufficient time will be
given to the public and Board constituents to provide
comments. As this is an "election year",
several comments will probably be made between the
period of May and November of 2000. The Board wants
to be able to digest these comments and make them
part of the review.
-
- D.
The timeline allows sufficient time between each
step for the proper review of the submitted report.
The Board believes that the Subcommittee/Executive
Director review and the final Board review should
be of a substantive nature, and not simply a "rubber
stamp" of prior work.
-
- E.
The timeline takes into account that this year is
an "election cycle" and the main focus
of the Board's staff will be on that project. While
the review process will be conducted during this
time, the Board wants to ensure that proper focus
and attention will be spent on the review process.
-
- VII.
Amount of agency time and resources spent on project:
-
- A.
The requirements of Executive Order 8 are a project
the Board had already begun to initiate. Therefore,
Executive Order 8 does not create an additional
impact. Burden on staff, other then the Board's
Legal Counsel, is minimal. The Board's Executive
Director has already initiated the process of obtaining
all policies not currently in rule form. Most of
the initial review done by Legal Counsel and Subcommittee
Chair will be conducted after normal working hours,
but Legal Counsel is not compensated for that time.
The review of the initial report by the Subcommittee
and Executive Director will be done on their own
time. The Subcommittee/Executive Director report
on the initial report will take place at the normally
scheduled Subcommittee meetings. The same is true
of the review of both reports and issuance of the
Final Report by the Board.
-
|
|

|
|
| last updated:
June 29, 2007
|
|