Iowa Teacher
Development Academy Application 2006
Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI)
|
District: AEA: |
|
Building(s) Requesting Participation: |
|
Mailing Address: |
|
E-mail address: |
|
Contact Person: |
|
Phone: |
1)
Alignment
with District Career Development Plans (3 points):
Participation in
CORI must align with the district and building goals and support the target
selected for professional development in the District Career Development Plan
and building level plans for PD. Each public school district in Iowa has
submitted a District Career Development Plan as part of their CSIP. Prior to
applying for participation in this Academy, the district professional
development leadership team should review student data and the District Career
Development Plan to make sure that CORI aligns well with goals and professional
development targets established in the CSIP.
|
List the reading
PD target for each building that is considering CORI: |
2)
Leadership
Team (3 points):
The district and/or
building should have a well functioning leadership team that plans professional
development, engages in decision making about how to sustain PD, and supports
the ongoing day to day work of implementing PD initiatives.
|
Describe the
composition of the PD leadership team(s) that operate at the district and
building level and explain how the team(s) functions. Provide information
about how the team(s) will coordinate and support CORI efforts as part of the
district/building professional development. |
3) Time
for collaboration (5 points):
Adequate time is provided for teachers to engage in collaborative team meetings. One hour a week to engage in collaborative team meetings with other CORI teachers on the team would be appropriate (45 minutes per week would be the minimum).
|
Briefly describe the schedule that will be provided for collaborative team meetings for CORI teachers: |
Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) is a model to optimize
the development of reading engagement. The instruction contains conceptual
themes, real world content area interactions, self-directed learning, strategy
instruction situated within conceptual contexts,
peer collaboration and self-expression of knowledge through portfolios and
exhibits. CORI benefits all students of all achievement levels across grade
levels and content areas.
|
Building: |
|
Summarize the
building reading data: Total # of
students Total # of free
and reduced lunch Total # of
minority students Total # of
students with IEPs Total # of ELL students % proficient 8th
grade for whole population and disaggregated for subgroups % proficient 11th
grade for whole population and disaggregated for subgroups Optional: Any
other data from reading assessment instruments |
Repeat as needed for
additional buildings.
5)
Class
composition (3 points):
Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) is a model to optimize
the development of reading engagement. The instruction contains conceptual
themes, real world content area interactions, self-directed learning, strategy
instruction situated within conceptual contexts,
peer collaboration and self-expression of knowledge through portfolios and
exhibits. (The optimal implementation plan would be a collaborative effort
between a Reading/Language Arts and a content area teacher, such as Social
Studies or Science, for a 90-minute instructional block. However, successful implementation of CORI
can occur within a 45-minute block)
|
Number of Sections
of CORI: |
Estimated number
of students per section. |
|
6) Team Composition
(5 points):
Participating
districts should send a team. Team members should include:
·
Reading/
Language Arts teachers and content area teachers for collaboration (These
should be grade level teams who work well together)
·
special
education teachers
·
Either a principal or a central office
administrator (e.g., curriculum director) or both. At least one person who has
the authority to make decisions about student scheduling, resources, teacher
planning time, etc. must be on the team.
First choice will be given to
teams that include a principal or other school administrator on their team.
·
Participation
by an AEA consultant is preferred. (A reading consultant or a consultant
previously engaged in the CORI Teacher Development Academy is strongly
recommended.) Each participating school
should contact their AEA consultant or the Educational Services Director for
their AEA and discuss how the AEA might support this initiative.
·
Reading
coach/strategist/instructional coach would be an asset to the team
·
Media
specialist would be an asset to the team
|
Teacher’s Name |
Grade Level |
Content Area |
Teacher’s Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal/Central office Name |
Job Title |
Building |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7)
Current context at the building level (5 points):
For professional development to be effective it has to be fully sustained and supported. Competing initiatives make it difficult for a comprehensive effort to be fully implemented. Describe reading efforts currently underway at the building level by completing the items below.
|
Describe current programs that are in place to serve struggling readers at the building level. Will CORI be added to the existing program(s) or replace it? If yes, please explain. Has the building PD in the last three years addressed reading problems of students? If yes, please describe any professional development that has focused on the reading needs of your students. |
8)
Assurances
In order to be considered in this competition the district must assure that the following conditions will be in place. Either the superintendent or building administrator must commit to meeting these assurances by initialing each statement and completing the signature section.
a)
Resources:
A classroom collection of fiction and nonfiction
materials is required in order to implement CORI. Students will need access to
a variety of texts at various grade and content areas in order to support the
CORI unit being implemented. Research
indicates the need for secondary students to have access to print materials in
the classroom.
Assurance: Resources will be provided.
__________________________________ Administrator’s initials
b)
Assessment
(required):
Participants must collect appropriate formative and
summative data. Measures will be explained during the Academy. Each student will be assessed using the
Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test and frequent informal assessments as well as
content area assessments. Participating schools will be expected to collect
summative assessment data as scheduled and submit the data to the Teacher
Development Academy Web Site (one person will be trained to enter data).
Schools will be given ordering information for the assessments when notified of their acceptance in the Academy.
Grant recipients pay for their own tests (Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test -- ordering information will be disseminated after grants are awarded.)
Assurance: Assessments will be
conducted and data will be submitted to web site.
__________________________________
Administrator’s initials
c)
Participants must implement the program as designed
(required):
In order to ensure that student achievement gains occur, it is necessary to implement CORI accurately. Participants are expected to implement the model as designed. Phases and principles in CORI must be integrated throughout the CORI unit. Additionally, explicit instruction of the strategies incorporated in CORI is necessary. A suggested framework for implementation will be provided in the training.
Only teachers trained in the Academy should teach CORI. No one will provide training in CORI unless
they have acquired DE recognition to be a trainer.
Assurance: All team members will implement the initiative as designed.
Only trainers trained in CORI will implement CORI. No one will provide training
in CORI.
__________________________________
Administrator's initials
d)
Full
attendance and engagement in all training sessions (required):
Participating districts must agree to send each participant to every session. The training includes 5 days in the summer, 2006, and 5 days of follow up sessions during the school year. Participants will be required to submit explicit instruction lessons, reflection charts and other evidence of implementation as requested by the trainer in order to determine fidelity to the model.
Teachers will be
asked to submit implementation data on a regular basis to their collaborative
team, who will organize and analyze it in order to determine future PD
sessions. Studies of the implementation data and sample lesson plans will be
submitted to the trainer on a regular basis.
Assurance: All team members will attend all training days. Participants
will submit logs and lesson plans as scheduled.
__________________________________ Administrator’s initials
9)
AEA
informed (required):
The AEA Educational
Services Director has been contacted to discuss this application and the AEA
role in supporting this imitative.
Assurance:
_______________________was contacted regarding AEA consultation to this
initiative.
List AEA name
10)
Signatures (required):
We agree that the team requesting application in this Academy will engage as described in the conditions of participation. The district will provide the supports listed in the condition of participation.
Principal Name Typed
Principal Signature Phone Number Date
Superintendent Name Typed
Superintendent Signature Phone Number Date
The submission of
applications will be via fax to Gretchen Kelley at 515-242-6025. Applications
will be due to the Department at 4:30 P.M. on February 10, 2006.