ENGLISH LANGUAGE
LEARNERS (ELL)
This Guide is designed to provide the district/building with a comprehensive overview of its practices and procedures. Please mark the answer by each statement that best describes your school district. In this district self-study guide, the term English Language Learners (ELLs) will be used instead of Limited English Proficiency (LEP). For definitions of terms please see attachments.
|
1. The district has a procedure to identify all students who have a primary or home language other than English. Please attach a copy of the procedures. |
Yes |
No |
|
2. District staff is knowledgeable of the procedures for identifying students who have a primary language other than English. |
Yes |
No |
|
3. School/district staff that works directly with parents and students in the identification of students, who have a primary of home language other than English, speak and understand the appropriate language(s). |
Yes |
No |
|
4. Documentation regarding each student’s primary or home language is maintained in student’s file. |
Yes |
No |
|
5. The district assesses on a yearly basis the English language proficiency of all students identified as having a primary or home language other than English in the four language areas (oral/speaking, reading, writing, and listening). |
Yes |
No |
|
6. The district conducts language proficiency assessments for students who have a primary or home language other than English, using: 6a. Formal assessments (e.g., tests). Name of test(s) used:_________________________________________________ |
Yes |
No |
|
6b. Informal assessments (e.g., teacher interviews, observations). |
Yes |
No |
|
7. Students who have a primary or home language other than English are assessed for language proficiency in their primary or home language. |
Yes |
No |
|
8. The district has developed
procedures to determine the effectiveness of its informal assessment
procedures. Please attach a copy of it. |
Yes |
No |
|
9. The district has
determined the level of English-language proficiency at which students are
considered English proficient. Please attach copy
of description. |
Yes |
No |
|
10. The district assesses ELL academic skills in relation to their grade or age level. Name(s) of instrument(s) used to assess ELL academic skills:
|
Yes |
No |
|
11. ELL who have been in the U.S. for 3 consecutive years are tested in English in reading/language arts. |
Yes |
No |
|
12. The district assesses ELL in the language and form most likely to yield accurate and reliable results. Language(s)
used:
|
Yes |
No |
|
13. The district uses the “Guidelines for the Inclusion of English Language Learners in Your District-wide Assessment Program” or similar documents to guide decision-making. |
Yes |
No |
|
13a. Total number of ELL included in your district wide assessment |
|
|
|
13b. Number
of ELL included in the district wide assessment with · NO accommodations |
|
|
|
· With accommodations Please attach documentation on accommodations used. |
|
|
|
13c. Number of ELL NOT included in your district-wide assessment. |
|
|
|
14. The district has established qualifications for individuals who administer language or academic assessments to ELL. |
Yes |
No |
PROGRAM (e.g., ESL, Bilingual, etc.)
|
15. Programs are available for ELL at each grade level. |
Yes |
No |
|
16. There are no substantial delays (e.g., more than 30 days) in placing ELL into an appropriate educational program. |
Yes |
No |
|
17. There is coordination of curriculum between teachers for ELL and teachers in the regular program. |
Yes |
No |
|
18. ELL in the high school program earn credits toward graduation. |
Yes |
No |
|
19. Instructional materials are adequate to meet the English language and academic needs of ELL. |
Yes |
No |
|
20. Parents are involved in the process of placing ELL in an appropriate educational program |
Yes |
No |
|
21.The district has a system to evaluate the success of their ELL program. Please attach a copy of the description of the evaluation plan. |
Yes |
No |
22. Label the program(s) at each level or attach a copy of description.
|
Level |
Program (See definitions) |
Teachers with ESL endorsement |
Paraprofessionals/aides |
|
Elementary |
|
|
|
|
Middle school |
|
|
|
|
High school |
|
|
|
|
23. The district has established qualifications for teachers who teach ELL. |
Yes |
No |
|
24. The district has established qualifications that the teachers' aides and/or paraprofessionals must meet. |
Yes |
No |
|
25. The district has teachers with ESL endorsement to teach ELL. |
Yes |
No |
|
25a. Number of ELL |
|
|
|
25b. Number of teachers with ESL endorsement |
|
|
|
26. The district provides high-quality professional development to classroom teachers and other district personnel. |
Yes |
No |
|
26a. Number of mainstream teachers that participated. |
|
|
|
26b. Number of ESL teachers that participated. |
|
|
|
26c. Number of paraprofessionals/teacher aides that participated |
|
|
|
27. The district provides training for interpreters and translators. |
Yes |
No |
|
28. Professional development activities are designed to improve instruction and assessment of ELL; enhance teachers’ ability to understand and use curricula, assessment measures, and instructional strategies for ELL; are based on scientifically based research; and are of sufficient intensity and duration to have a lasting impact on teachers’ performance. |
Yes |
No |
|
29. Teachers of ELL are fluent in English and, when appropriate, in any other language(s) used for instruction, including having written and oral communication skills. |
Yes |
No |
|
30. The district has provided training to staff who administer, evaluate, and interpret the results of the assessment methods used. |
Yes |
No |
|
31. The district has established an exit criterion. Please attach a description of it. |
Yes |
No |
|
How many ELL exit the program after: 31a. less than 1 year |
|
|
|
31b. 1 to 3 years |
|
|
|
31c. 3 to 5 years |
|
|
|
31d. 5 years or more |
|
|
|
32. The exit criteria ensures that ELL can: 32a. Speak English sufficiently well to participate in the district’s general educational program. |
Yes |
No |
|
32b. Read English sufficiently well to participate in the district’s general educational program. |
Yes |
No |
|
32c. Write English sufficiently well to participate in the district’s general educational program. |
Yes |
No |
|
32d. Comprehend English sufficiently well to participate (meaningfully) in the district’s general educational program. |
Yes |
No |
|
33. The district monitors the
academic progress of ELL who have exited the program. |
Yes |
No |
|
33a. Average years of monitoring |
|
|
|
34. The school district determines whether ELL
are performing at a level comparable to their English-speaking peers? Please attach documentation (e.g., disaggregated results from
ITP) |
Yes |
No |
|
35. The district has established procedures for
responding to deficient academic performance of ELL. Please attach a copy of procedures. |
Yes |
No |
|
36. ELL re-enter the
alternative language program if they experience academic difficulties in the
regular program. Please describe under what conditions. |
Yes |
No |
|
37. Achievements, honors, awards, or other special recognition rates of ELL are similar to those of their peers. |
Yes |
No |
|
37a. Percent of English-monolingual students in Talented and Gifted programs |
|
|
|
37b. Percent of ELL in Talented and Gifted programs |
|
|
|
37c. Percent of ELL in district |
|
|
|
38. The district conducts a formal evaluation of its program for ELL to determine its effectiveness. Please attach a copy of the
report. |
Yes |
No |
|
39. The district disaggregates data of ELL. |
Yes |
No |
|
39a. grade retention |
Yes |
No |
|
39b. graduation |
Yes |
No |
|
39c. dropout rates |
Yes |
No |
|
39d. gender |
Yes |
No |
|
39e. English proficiency |
Yes |
No |
|
39f. economically disadvantaged |
Yes |
No |
|
39g. ITBS/ITED achievement levels |
Yes |
No |
|
39h. multiple measures of academic achievement |
Yes |
No |
Please attach copies of disaggregated data
|
40. The quality of facilities and services available to ELL are comparable to those available to all other students. |
Yes |
No |
|
41. The quality and quantity of instructional materials in the program are comparable to the instructional materials provided to all other students. |
Yes |
No |
|
42. ELL participate in classes, activities, and assemblies with all the other students |
Yes |
No |
|
43. ELL have access to the full school curriculum (both required and elective courses, including vocational education) while they are participating in the language program. |
Yes |
No |
|
44. Counseling services provided to ELL are comparable to those available to all other students. |
Yes |
No |
|
45. ELL have opportunities for full participation in special opportunity programs, (e.g., Gifted & Talented, Advanced Classes, Title I, Special Education programs, etc.) |
Yes |
No |
|
46. ELL are not segregated while taking their classes |
Yes |
No |
|
47. In general, ELL are integrated in classes such as P.E. music, arts, etc. |
Yes |
No |
|
48. The district utilizes procedures for
identifying ELL who may be in need of special education services. Please attach copy. |
Yes |
No |
|
49. The district’s procedures for identifying and assessing ELL for special education takes into account language and cultural differences. Please attach copy. |
Yes |
No |
|
50. Testing instruments used to assess ELL for special education placement are valid and reliable for these specific students. |
Yes |
No |
|
51. Persons who administer special education assessment tests to ELL are specially trained in administering the tests. |